Former Westmoreland corrections officer claims she was victim of racial discrimination | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Former Westmoreland corrections officer claims she was victim of racial discrimination

Rich Cholodofsky
1531291_web1_gtr-liv-jailedparentsdoc1-051719

A former Westmoreland County Prison corrections officer claims she was the victim of racial discrimination when she was subjected to derogatory statements from co-workers and inmates, unwarranted discipline and erroneously blamed for an unnecessary inspection of cells.

Bonita Hughey, 53, of Jeannette, in a lawsuit filed in Greensburg, said her repeated complaints about the treatment she received from fellow jail guards, administrators and inmates went unanswered and because of her race she was subjected to a hostile work environment.

According to the lawsuit, Hughey, who is black, claimed she was a victim of racism almost immediately after being hired in March 2016. She claims she was singled out and intimidated by white male guards who falsely claimed she wore a Black Lives Matter T-shirt under her uniform.

Hughey claimed she was frozen out by other guards and accused of “snitching” on co-workers. According to the lawsuit, she said jail administrators and the county’s human resources department did not take her complaints seriously or properly investigate the accusations.

County solicitor Melissa Guiddy said Monday the county would not comment on Hughey’s lawsuit.

According to county payroll records, Hughey was hired as a part-time guard and earned about $15 an hour before she was fired in July 2016.

In her lawsuit, Hughey contends she was fired after county officials accused her of causing an unneeded shake down of inmates after she falsely claimed she lost her dentures while on the job in the jail.

Hughey’s lawyer, John Newborg of Pittsburgh, wrote in the lawsuit Hughey did not wear dentures and her comment was a joke. Hughey claims she was never told an inspection of cells was ordered as a result of her statement.

“The shake down was not normal procedure under the circumstances and would not have occurred except for the fact that management wanted to blame the plaintiff for causing the shake down,” according to the lawsuit.

Hughey said she was assigned duties she was not trained to perform and scheduled to work undesirable shifts in retaliation for complaints she made against a supervisor. Hughey contended she was assigned to work midnight shifts in male inmate units during Pittsburgh Penguins hockey games, “when the conduct of the inmates was agitated, disruptive and more difficult to control.”

Hughey is seeking back pay and benefits lost after being fired more than three years ago, unspecified compensatory damages for emotional distress and punitive damages.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.