‘Friendly fire’ painting joins Fort Ligonier’s Washington gallery | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

‘Friendly fire’ painting joins Fort Ligonier’s Washington gallery

Jeff Himler

Renowned artist and Ligonier native Chas Fagan has painted portraits of all the U.S. presidents, including George Washington.

Friday evening, he unveiled a more active impression of Washington — as a 26-year-old Virginia colonel faced with “friendly fire” in a French and Indian War engagement near Fort Ligonier.

Fagan presented his painting of the military action, titled “Flash Point,” at the annual meeting of the Fort Ligonier Association, which commissioned the image for display in the new George Washington Gallery at the fort museum.

“It’s something I’ve been interested in for a long time,” Fagan said of the Nov. 12, 1758, incident — a pivotal but lesser-known episode in Washington’s pre-Revolutionary War career.

“It shows him as a younger man,” he said of the painting. “His expression is not that of the sedate, square-jawed guy on the dollar bill.”

The framed 62-by-44-inch painting will be displayed near a copy of Washington’s “Remarks,” his handwritten account of his years on the Pennsylvania frontier, including the traumatic friendly fire engagement. Fagan drew upon that document as well as other historical works to guide the design of his painting.

“It’s incredible to have these notes about this event written out in his own hand,” he said.

Determined to thwart a raiding party of French Marines and Native Americans, two groups of Virginian troops — one of them led by Washington — attempted to surround the enemy.

Instead, with the sun setting and a fog emerging, the Virginians collided with each other.

Adding to the confusion, Fagan noted, some of the Virginians were dressed in civilian garb, having worn out their standard military clothing.

At a central point in Fagan’s painting, Washington is seen “knocking up the barrel of the musket with his sword,” to bring a halt to the mistaken exchange of fire.

Captain Thomas Bullitt is another identifiable figure depicted attempting to stop the friendly fire.

“He was recorded as having run down in between the lines waving his hat,” Fagan said.

Fagan had about a year to complete the painting but noted he doesn’t track the time he spends on a given creative project. He completed the image by applying oil paint on linen.

To match the look of the painting with its subject, he said, “I used an older technique, painting in thin layers. I muted the palette and kept it very limited.”

Fagan’s title for the painting is apt because the disastrous engagement ended on a positive note for the forces at Fort Ligonier.

They captured a French prisoner, who revealed the French forces at Fort Duquesne were more vulnerable than the British had believed. Instead of wintering at Fort Ligonier, the British advanced and successfully seized Fort Duquesne, site of the future Pittsburgh.

Fagan noted Washington’s friendly fire incident was a “terrible experience that kind of steeled him for the next phase” — defeating the British in the Revolutionary War.

Visit fortligonier.org for more information about Ligonier’s authentically reconstructed British fort and the associated museum and education center.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .


1078578_web1_gtr-FaganPainting2-042619
Jeff Himler | Tribune-Review
Artist Chas Fagan unveils his painting, “Flash Point,” at the annual meeting Friday of the Fort Ligonier Association in the Fort Ligonier Center for History Education.
1078578_web1_gtr-FaganPainting1-042719
Jeff Himler | Tribune-Review
“Flash Point,” a painting by Ligonier native Chas Fagan, depicts George Washington’s effort to end a friendly fire incident on Nov. 12, 1758, near Fort Ligonier. It will hang in the Fort Ligonier museum’s George Washington Gallery.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.