Greensburg banquet honors firefighters | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Greensburg banquet honors firefighters

Jacob Tierney
1184065_web1_gtr-firehonors-052119
Greensburg Volunteer Fire Department
Members of the Greensburg Volunteer Fire Department pose at the department’s annual banquet Saturday, May 18, 2019.

The Greensburg Volunteer Fire Department on Saturday paid tribute to three recently deceased firefighters at its 112th annual Firemen’s Memorial Service.

The service honors firefighters who have died in the last year:

• Joseph T. Suarez, 70, served with Greensburg Hose Company No. 6 for 45 years, until his death in September.

• Gary Vincent Bell, 63, was a firefighter for about 46 years, serving with Greensburg Hose Company No. 6, Hempfield Volunteer Fire Department #2 and Greensburg Hose Company No. 7. He died in March.

• Raymond D. Shaffer, 90, was a firefighter with Greensburg Hose Co. No. 8 for 66 years, until his death in August.

The memorial service was part of the department’s annual banquet, attended by more than 100 people including firefighters, their families and local officials.

The event also honored three firefighters who have been with the department for 25 years, earning lifetime membership status: Timothy Wian, Galen Ross and David Romagnoli.

The following awards were presented during the banquet:

• Company 1 Firefighter of the Year: Christian Koury

• Company 2 Firefighter of the Year: Jeff Heater

• Company 3 Firefighter of the Year: Andrew Strezo

• Company 6 Firefighter of the Year: Rob Giles

• Company 7 Firefighter of the Year: Dan Fencil

• Company 8 Firefighter of the Year: Roman Lamberski

• Junior Firefighter of the Year: Zachery Long

• Humanitarian of the Year: Glenn Thomas

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.