Greensburg Diocese priest placed on leave last year now retiring |

Greensburg Diocese priest placed on leave last year now retiring

Stephen Huba
Diocese of Greensburg
Monsignor Michael Matusak.

A priest who was placed on leave last year over a sexual abuse accusation has been approved for retirement, the Diocese of Greensburg said.

Monsignor Michael W. Matusak’s retirement, effective July 1, was one of five priest retirements approved by Greensburg Bishop Edward C. Malesic. He is retiring because he reached the retirement age of 70 this year, diocesan spokesman Jerry Zufelt said.

Matusak of Latrobe will live at the priests’ retirement facility in Greensburg.

Matusak had been serving as pastor of St. Therese, Little Flower of Jesus Parish, St. John the Evangelist Parish, St. Joseph Parish and St. Mary (Nativity) Parish, all in Uniontown, at the time of his suspension in August 2018.

He previously served at St. Pius X Parish in Mt. Pleasant. The allegation against Matusak stemmed from his time at St. Pius X (1997-2008). Following the release of a statewide grand jury report in August, a woman who had been a parishioner at St. Pius X emailed the diocese to say that Matusak molested her when she was a teenager.

The diocese placed Matusak on leave and referred the matter to Westmoreland County District Attorney John Peck.

“The civil investigation into the allegation against Monsignor Matusak is still ongoing,” Zufelt said. “The diocese will begin its canonical investigation after being informed of the results of the civil investigation.”

Matusak was one of three Greensburg priests removed from ministry over sexual abuse allegations following the grand jury report.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.