Greensburg hires planning director |

Greensburg hires planning director

Jacob Tierney

Greensburg has a new planning director after a five-month search.

Jeffrey Raykes will take over the city’s planning department July 29.

“We’re extremely excited to have him,” said Greensburg Mayor Robert Bell. “He comes with impeccable credentials.”

Raykes will leave his position as deputy director of the Indiana County Office of Planning and Development, where he’s worked 13 years.

He also teaches planning as an adjunct professor at Indiana University of Pennsylvania.

Raykes said he’s looking forward to getting started.

“The challenge that I have right now is going from zero to 100 miles per hour as quickly as possible,” he said.

Though he’s been a planner and a professor for years, there are always new things to learn about the field, he said.

“I think the big thing is listening to people,” he said.

Raykes replaces Barbara Ciampini, whom city council unanimously voted to fire in February. She worked with the planning department for 35 years.

The reason for her firing has not been disclosed.

City council began the search for a new director shortly after Ciampini’s departure, twice postponing a decision and extending the search.

Bell said the wait was worth it to find a candidate with Raykes’ qualifications.

The city will pay Raykes $73,000 a year. Ciampini made $73,500.

Greensburg recently has made several major changes to the way it operates its planning department, including dissolving the Historic and Architectural Review Board, delegating its advisory duties to the planning commission.

Raykes said he sees a bright future for the city.

“There’s a lot of potential, and a lot of promise,” he said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.