Greensburg man accused by city police of assaulting ex-girlfriend | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Greensburg man accused by city police of assaulting ex-girlfriend

Paul Peirce
1359410_web1_Handcuffs

A 22-year-old Greensburg man was arrested on multiple criminal charges of breaking into his ex-girlfriend’s apartment and assaulting her early Sunday, according to city police.

Elijah Shalil Vento was arrested on charges of burglary, simple assault, criminal mischief and harassment after the 4:37 a.m. incident on the 300 block of Westminster Avenue. Vento was arraigned before District Judge Mark Mansour and ordered held in the county prison after failing to post $75,000 bail.

Police said in court documents when they arrived for a report of a burglary in progress they discovered the victim crying, with multiple bruises and bleeding from a cut on her forearm. She alleged Vento, her ex-boyfriend, entered the house through a basement door, went to her bedroom where an argument ensued and he began physically assaulting her.

She told police she ran from the house to her car to flee, but it wouldn’t start. The victim told police Vento followed her and she attempted to take cover inside the car.

However, Vento continued assaulting her and broke a window in the vehicle causing the laceration. Vento ran before police arrived, but was arrested later.

A preliminary hearing is scheduled July 18 before Greensburg District Judge Chris Flanigan.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.