ShareThis Page
Greensburg man ordered to jail after 3rd drug arrest in 13 months |

Greensburg man ordered to jail after 3rd drug arrest in 13 months

Paul Peirce

A third arrest for delivery and possession of a controlled substance in just over a year resulted in a Greensburg man being ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison without bond this week.

When acting District Judge Charles Conway saw on a state police complaint filed Monday that Malcolm Massay, 35, has been arrested three times in 13 months, including Sunday, for possessing and distribution of a controlled substance for allegedly possessing more than an ounce of cocaine, Conway declined to set bond.

Conway ruled the safety of the community was at risk with Massey’s potential release in light of the multiple arrests, according to court dockets.

In the most recent case, Massey was a passenger in a sport utility vehicle that was pulled over at 9:30 p.m. Sunday on Route 30 eastbound near Wendel Road in Hempfield, according to Trooper Glenn Adams. Adams reported that during a consensual search Massey possessed more than one ounce of suspected cocaine.

On Jan. 1o, 2018, Adams had stopped Massay near the same section of Route 30 as he drove a 2018 Nissan Altima. The trooper allegedly discovered him in possession of two ounces of cocaine, digital scales and driving on a suspended license. Last March 28, Greensburg police arrested Massay for possession of marijuana, driving under the influence, driving on a suspended license and blocking an alley.

He was free on $60,000 bail awaiting trial in common pleas court on the 2018 complaints.

Conway scheduled Massey’s hearing on the most recent complaint Feb. 28 before Jeannette District Judge Joseph DeMarchis.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.