ShareThis Page
Hundreds turn out for Greensburg Open bowling tournament’s 30th year | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hundreds turn out for Greensburg Open bowling tournament’s 30th year

Jacob Tierney

Close to 430 bowlers crowded the lanes at Main Bowling Center in Greensburg on Sunday, competing for a tournament championship that is worth $1,500 to the winner.

The 30th Greensburg Open bowling tournament resumed Sunday at the center, attracting bowlers from throughout Western Pennsylvania, as well as Ohio, West Virginia and even as far as New Jersey, said Jim Heater of Southwest Greensburg, tournament director and bowling center manager.

The tournament will stretch over the next two Sundays, with the championship being decided on March 17, when 32 bowlers will battle for the crown, Heater said.

“It’s still really popular,” Heater said.

One of the bowlers who has bowled in all 30 tournaments is George Ross of Mt. Pleasant, who bowls in a league at Main Bowling Center. Ross, a winner of the 2011 tournament, said he looks forward to the competition at the annual event.

Mark Sternick of Greensburg has competed in almost all of the 30 tournaments.

“It’s almost an annual tradition,” said Sternick, who said he grew up bowling with Heater.

Sternick has come close to winning the tournament and was a runner-up one year.

“You’ve got a lot of good bowlers here,” Sternick said.

Among those good bowlers was Jim Petzel, 49, of Plum, who won the tournament in 1994, the first time he entered. Such is the level of competition that he still is seeking his second championship.

“I’ve got hooked and have been here ever since,” said Petzel, who started bowling as a young boy in Connellsville.

Heater created the tournament in 1990, combining different formats from other tournaments “and put them into one,” he said. That first year, there were about 90 bowlers. Last year, there were more than 400.

Because of the large number of competitors, the preliminary round takes place over three weekends — March 3, 10 and 17. The first preliminary round started Sunday morning

Each competitor bowls four games in the preliminaries. Their worst game is dropped from their score.

The 32 bowlers with the highest combined score go on to the finals, which will be held March 17.

There are additional cash prizes for bowlers who come in 60th place or better, and bonuses for seniors, women and youths.

Among the few women in the competition was Justyne Falbo of Hempfield, who has been bowling in the tournament the past five years.

“The competition is really tough,” said the 23-year-old bowler, acknowledging how difficult it will be to win.

“Maybe this time,” Falbo said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .


817006_web1_gtr-Gbgbowl-030419
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Justyne Falbo, 23, of Hempfield, gets ready to bowl in the Greensburg Open bowling tournament Sunday, March 3, 2019 at Main Bowl lanes in Greensburg.
817006_web1_gtr-gbgbowl2-030419
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review Joe Napsha| Tribune-Review
Mark Sternick of Greensburg tosses his bowling ball down the lane at Main Bowling Center in Greensburg during the Greensburg Open bowling tournament on Sunday, March 3, 2019.
817006_web1_gtr-Gbgbowl3-030419
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
George Ross of Mt. Pleasant, who has bowled in all 30 of the Greensburg Open bowling tournaments at the Main Bowling Center in Greensburg on Sunday, March 3, 2019.
817006_web1_gtr-Gbgbowl4-030419
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.