ShareThis Page
Greensburg police accuse Latrobe man of bilking couple out of $2,000 |

Greensburg police accuse Latrobe man of bilking couple out of $2,000

Paul Peirce
| Wednesday, January 2, 2019 11:58 a.m
Sean L. Hurley

Greensburg police have obtained an arrest warrant for a Latrobe man who allegedly accepted $2,000 as partial payment for a roof repair project that was never started.

Sean L. Hurley, 34, is charged with one count of home improvement fraud and theft by deception.

Frank and Kelly Kern of Bella Street reported Hurley accepted money for construction supplies to complete repairs to their home Oct. 22, city Detective Charles Irvin said in court documents.

The Kerns were familiar with Hurley after he assisted them with removing a tree from their yard earlier in the year, Irvin reported. However, after repeated delays on the roof project, the Kerns asked Hurley to return their down payment.

At the time of the agreement, Hurley asked to be paid in cash because he did not have a bank account in order to cash a check, the Kerns told police. The Kerns provided police with an invoice signed by Hurley confirming he received the down payment.

Hurley is described as a white male about six feet tall and weighing 170 pounds. Police said Hurley’s last known address was on B Street in Latrobe.

Anyone with information should contact police at 724-834-3800.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter @ppeirce_trib.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.