Greensburg to establish vacant property registry, fines for absentee owners | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Greensburg to establish vacant property registry, fines for absentee owners

Jacob Tierney
1535992_web1_gtr-CountyDistress-062619
Stephen Huba | Tribune-Review
The former Advance Furniture Building on South Main Street in Greensburg.

Greensburg will create a registry of the city’s vacant properties at the expense of absentee property owners, according to Mayor Robert Bell.

“There’s all these vacant properties around town, and we just want to have some kind of regulation,” Bell said.

Under the ordinance passed this week by city council, owners of vacant properties will need to register those properties with the city for a fee, and renew the registration yearly.

Council has yet to set that fee, Bell said.

It will likely do so at September’s meeting.

Once the fee is set, property owners will have 30 days to register.

If an owner defaults on their mortgage, the city will inspect the property to see if it is vacant, according to the ordinance.

The ordinance also creates new maintenance and security requirements. Owners are responsible for keeping vacant properties free of weeds and debris, and ensuring the building is secure.

Those who fail to register or maintain their properties can be taken to court, and if convicted could be subject to fines of $1,000 per violation per day.

“There has to be some kind of penalty for keeping these properties this way,” Bell said.

Many of the city’s properties are bought by out-of-town investors who sit on them for years without making improvements, he said. He hopes the new requirements will motivate owners to fix up their properties, or sell them to someone who will.

The city already pursues legal action against absentee owners for code violations, and often has difficulty tracking down the owners. The new ordinance provides another tool for the city to use in its fight against blight, Bell said.

In 2017 the Tribune-Review found about 20% of downtown commercial properties were vacant. That figure has remained pretty much the same for many years, according to data collected by the Greensburg Community Development Corp.

The city implemented its “Red X” program in 2017, designating the worst-off buildings with signs displaying a red “X” to signify they are dilapidated and could be dangerous to emergency responders.

Since then the city demolished more than 20 buildings as part of a sweeping anti-blight campaign.

Gov. Tom Wolf in June toured several vacant buildings in downtown Greensburg, promoting his Restore Pennsylvania plan that would implement a severance tax on natural gas to raise $300 million a year to battle blight.

There have been some signs of downtown revival this year. Several long-vacant buildings on South Pennsylvania Avenue are under renovation, slated to become an apartment building, a co-working space and an antique shop.

One of Main Street’s most prominent vacant buildings — the former Barclay-Westmoreland Trust Co. — is being renovated by a New Jersey developer with plans to turn it into office space for startups.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.