Greensburg woman accused of defrauding elderly Derry Twp. woman |

Greensburg woman accused of defrauding elderly Derry Twp. woman

Joe Napsha

A Greensburg woman hired to take care of an elderly Derry Township woman is accused of buying herself gift cards totaling almost $2,200 by using a woman’s credit card at two area supermarkets, state police at Greensburg said.

The suspect, Mary Ellen Poscich, 45, allegedly defrauded the woman out of $2,198 by using her Discover credit card seven times between Dec. 3 and Feb. 22 to buy gift cards at the Shop ‘n Save supermarket on Lincoln Road in Latrobe and twice at the Giant Eagle supermarket at Mountain Laurel Plaza along Route 30 in Unity, according to court documents.

Police said Poscich told them she was “having a rough time with medical expenses” since she was diagnosed with diabetes in November.

Authorities were notified when the woman questioned the supermarket charges on her credit card bill. State police said they obtained video surveillance of Poscich allegedly purchasing the gift cards.

Poscich was arraigned Thursday before Derry Township District Judge Mark Bilik on two counts of theft and single counts of receiving stolen property and access device fraud. She was released on her own recognizance, pending a preliminary hearing before Bilik on March 27.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.