Greensburg woman convicted in torture death to get another psych evaluation |

Greensburg woman convicted in torture death to get another psych evaluation

Rich Cholodofsky
Westmoreland County Prison
Angela Marinucci

Nearly a decade after Angela Marinucci and five other Greensburg roommates were arrested and charged with the torture slaying of a mentally challenged woman, Westmoreland County taxpayers continue to pay their legal bills.

Common Pleas Court Judge Rita Hathaway this week approved the payment of another $1,150 to a private psychiatrist to evaluate Marinucci ahead of a court appearance next month when she will be resentenced for a third time.

Marinucci’s sentencing hearing is scheduled for Dec. 17.

Marinucci is one of six defendants convicted of murder in connection with the February 2010 killing of 30-year-old Jennifer Daugherty, who was held captive for more than two days during which she was beaten, tortured and stabbed to death.

Marinucci, now 27, was convicted of first-degree murder and sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole. Twice, Pennsylvania appeals courts overturned that sentence, saying juveniles cannot be sentenced to life without parole unless a judge determines they are unable to be rehabilitated. Marinucci was 17 at the time of her arrest.

Westmoreland County court officials on Friday were not able to determine how much public money has been spent to pay for Marinucci’s court-appointed lawyers and experts hired to assist her defense. Earlier this year, Hathaway authorized defense lawyer Michael DeMatt to hire a psychiatrist for up to $5,000.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.