Greensburg woman accused of DUI after being found passed out in running car | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Greensburg woman accused of DUI after being found passed out in running car

Paul Peirce
1303987_web1_CopLights10

A Greensburg woman was under the influence of Suboxone and marijuana when she was found passed out in her car with an infant strapped in a car seat at a New Alexandria convenience store late Saturday, state police allege in court documents.

Chelsey L. Persin, 35, of Greensburg, was arraigned in night court on charges of child endangerment, driving under the influence of a controlled substance, possession of a controlled substance, careless driving and reckless driving filed by state police at Kiski. District Judge Helen Kistler ordered Persin held in the county prison after she failed to post $25,000 bail pending a preliminary hearing June 26 before Derry District Judge Mark Bilik.

Trooper Robert Blystone reported an off-duty fireman called paramedics, firefighters and state police to respond to the Sheetz store at the intersection of routes 22 and 981 after he saw Persin unconscious in the driver’s seat in a running car with an infant girl fastened in a car seat behind her.

Persin was revived at the scene and “showed multiple signs of impairment,” Blystone said.

During an interview, Person told Blystone she had taken Suboxone, for which she has a prescription, and marijuana pills. Suboxone is a drug recovering addicts who used heroin and other opiates use to reduce withdrawal symptoms.

Police confiscated a bottle containing the marijuana pills from inside Persin’s car.

The infant was placed in the custody of a relative. Persin was taken to Excela Health Latrobe Hospital for a blood test before being arraigned.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.