Greensburg prepares to dissolve Historic and Architectural Review Board |

Greensburg prepares to dissolve Historic and Architectural Review Board

Jacob Tierney
Greensburg City Hall

The agenda at Tuesday’s meeting of the Greensburg Historical and Architectural Review Board was typical — approving a straightforward sign change at a gas station. The circumstances, however, were not.

The meeting was likely one of the board’s last, as city council moves to dissolve the organization that serves as gatekeeper for most commercial development in Greensburg.

Board members said they didn’t know about the city’s plan to dissolve the board until after council’s preliminary vote Monday.

That vote directed the city solicitor to draft an ordinance to abolish the Historical and Architectural Review Board.

That ordinance could be introduced at the June meeting and put to a final vote the following month.

Mayor Robert Bell said the board created unnecessary extra steps for developers in Greensburg. Those who wanted to build or renovate a downtown property would need to seek the recommendation of two boards — the planning commission and HARB — before getting final approval from city council.

“We just felt that there was redundancy there,” Bell said. “We’re trying to facilitate development.”

The seven-member board oversees all proposed construction in downtown Greensburg and along Main, Otterman, Pittsburgh and West Newton streets — the main roadways through the city.

Chairwoman Barbara Jones has served on the board since it was founded in 2007. She said she wishes the city well with its decision but defended the work the board has done over the years.

“It’s been to maintain the character of historic Greensburg,” she said. “The design guidelines weren’t meant to be onerous in any way.”

Ashley Kertes, director of the Greensburg Community Development Corporation and a HARB member, said she thinks the board has done good, but understands the city’s desire to streamline the development process.

“I do think the HARB board did have its value, but I can also see both sides,” she said.

The HARB cannot approve or deny projects. It makes recommendations to council, which has final say over development.

Bell said the planning commission will assume HARB’s duties.

Jones said she hopes someone from HARB is given a seat on the planning commission to help continue the board’s mission in a new capacity.

“Someone has to be responsible for the look of the city,” she said.

The decision to dissolve HARB is one of several sweeping changes council has made related to planning and development.

In February, council fired longtime planning director Barbara Ciampini. The reason for the firing remains undisclosed.

The city will hire two people to replace her, Bell said — a planning director and a code enforcement officer.

The city’s previous code enforcement officer retired in 2015. Ciampini assumed many of his duties, and the city hired Pittsburgh company Code.sys to handle much of the day-to-day code enforcement work.

The city will continue to contract with Code.sys once it hires a new officer, Bell said.

Officials have twice postponed a vote on a new planning director.

The city has interviewed several candidates but wants to take its time to ensure it makes the right choice, Bell said.

Jacob Tierney is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jacob at 724-836-6646, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.