ShareThis Page
Harm reduction movement pushes addiction advocacy, needle exchange in Westmoreland County | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Harm reduction movement pushes addiction advocacy, needle exchange in Westmoreland County

Deb Erdley
| Thursday, March 14, 2019 5:03 p.m
880616_web1_needles_2

The Pennsylvania Harm Reduction Coalition wants to spark a conversation and continued commitment to action around addiction and substance abuse in Westmoreland County.

Among its goals: expand access to Naloxone and medication-assisted recovery programs and establish sterile needle exchanges for intravenous drug users.

The Philadelphia-based coalition on Saturday will hold the third in a series of statewide Community Engagement and Advocacy Forums, this time in Greensburg.

The group describes itself as a loose collaborative of treatment providers, harm reduction programs, medical entities, social service agencies, academia, criminal justice reform projects, activists and concerned citizens that advocate for public policy changes to benefit people and communities struggling with substance abuse.

The sold-out forum this weekend at the Westmoreland County Courthouse will feature presentations by Devin Reeves, coalition executive director, and Brooke Feldman, a social activist and consultant on treatment, recovery and addiction issues, who like Reeves, describes herself as an individual in long-term recovery.

“The broad goals of the forums — two of which have already been held in Allegheny and Luzerne counties — are to garner community feedback to empower advocacy efforts and provide guidance to trainees on actionable steps to advocate for policy change on harm reduction issues, including syringe services, expanded access to Naloxone and medication-assisted recovery,” Reeves said.

U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Jerome Adams and experts at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention support sterile needle exchanges. In Pennsylvania, only Pittsburgh and Philadelphia permit them under local ordinances. Elsewhere, such services are banned under the state’s drug control act.

Carmen Capozzi launched Sage’s Army, a local substance abuse prevention and advocacy organization, after his son’s overdose death in 2012. Capozzi said some here hesitate to endorse needle exchanges. But he supports them.

“It’s the next step,” said Capozzi, of Irwin. “We fought for the Good Samaritan Act, prescription monitoring and Narcan. Needle exchanges are the next step. Maybe we can’t stop people from using, but we can treat the symptoms and stop the transmission of diseases. I could show you over a dozen people I know who almost lost a limb because of abscesses from dirty needles,” he said.

Capozzi, like Reeves, said it would be foolhardy to end efforts to combat the region’s addiction epidemic just because overdose deaths declined last year.

The county coroner’s office reported about 120 overdose deaths last year, down from a record of more than 190 overdose deaths in 2017. The 2018 figure is the lowest overdose death total in the county since 2014.

“We advocate for policies that improve the quality of life for people who use drugs, people in recovery, and their communities,” Reeves said. “Our communities are still facing crisis level overdoses, and the impact of substance use disorder is still profound. It is pivotal that community members galvanize their efforts to ensure that key decision makers continue to embrace a public health response to the overdose epidemic.”

Deb Erdley is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Deb at 412-320-7996, derdley@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.