Hempfield doctor seeks to withdraw no-contest plea to murder charge | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield doctor seeks to withdraw no-contest plea to murder charge

Rich Cholodofsky
1583046_web1_gtr-Peske
Dr. Edgar Peske

Prosecutors from the state Attorney General’s office say that a Hempfield doctor should not be permitted to withdraw a no-contest plea entered earlier this year to a murder charge.

Edgar Peske, 80, was charged two years ago with drug delivery resulting in death in connection with the 2015 overdose death of Nicole Henderson, 30, of Unity. Police said Henderson died after the doctor prescribed her 100 methadone pills.

His no contest plea to the drug delivery count, as well as felony charges of the administration of a controlled substance by a practitioner and Medicaid fraud, are considered convictions under state law.

Just days after prosecutors filed court documents in which they said they would ask a Westmoreland County judge to sentence Peske to more than six years in prison, lawyers for the doctor countered and said their client now insists he is innocent of the drug delivery charge.

Deputy Attorney Generals Jeffrey Baxter and Mary Summer Ford Carroll on Friday in a court filing said Peske is only seeking to withdraw his plea as a delay tactic.

“In the time since the defendant entered a plea there has been absolutely no change in information or circumstances that have come to the attention of the defendant. Rather, since entering a plea the defendant has repeatedly delayed justice with repeated postponements of the sentencing and is further delaying justice with a motion for withdrawal of plea,” prosecutors wrote.

Peske is scheduled to appear Aug. 30 before Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger for a hearing on the request to withdraw the no-contest plea.

Defense attorneys Brian Aston and Ken Noga last month said Peske contends his patient would not have died had she properly taken her medication and that she likely had suicidal tendencies that led to her death.

Prosecutors said the defense’s theory of the case does not absolve Peske of the crimes.

“If the defendant wrote a prescription for a controlled substance, in this case, Methadone, in a manner that no responsible segment of the medical profession would find appropriate and the victim died, he is guilty of that charge,” prosecutors said.

Investigators contended Henderson had been a longtime patient of Peske’s and that he knew she had a history of addiction.

Henderson was one several patients who were prescribed a total of more than 104,000 pills by Peske in the previous 22 months, police said. One patient, according to court records, was prescribed 30 pills a day of the painkiller oxycodone.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.