Hempfield doctor wants to withdraw plea in overdose death | TribLIVE.com

Hempfield doctor wants to withdraw plea in overdose death

Rich Cholodofsky
Dr. Edgar Peske

A Hempfield doctor scheduled to be sentenced Monday for prescribing a patient a fatal dose of methadone wants to withdraw his no contest plea entered in March.

Edgar Peske, 80, in court documents filed last week, contends his conduct did not cause the 2015 death of Nicole Henderson, 30, of Unity and wants a jury to decide his case.

As a result, Monday’s sentencing hearing before Westmoreland County Judge Tim Krieger was canceled. The judge will schedule another hearing to consider Peske’s request to withdraw his plea.

Peske was charged in 2017 with drug delivery resulting in death and two other counts related to Henderson’s fatal overdose. Peske entered a no contest plea to the all three charges he faced and at the time said it was in his best interest to do so.

Prosecutors said Peske prescribed 100 methadone pills for Henderson’s withdrawal symptoms two weeks before she died. After her pharmacy refused to fill the order, Peske reissued the prescription with the notation that it was for pain management, investigators said.

Henderson died one day later, according to court records.

Investigators contended Henderson had been a longtime patient of Peske’s and that he knew she had a history of addiction.

Henderson was one several patients who were prescribed a total of more than 104,000 pills by Peske in the previous 22 months, police said. One patient, according to court records, was prescribed 30 pills a day of the painkiller oxycodone.

Defense lawyers Brian Aston and Ken Noga, in court documents filed Friday, said Henderson would not have died had she taken the prescribed medication as her doctor had advised.

“The petitioner avers there is no indication Ms. Henderson had ever overdosed on medication prescribed by him in the course of his treatment over many years and he had no reason to believe she would on methadone,” the lawyers wrote.

They also contended Henderson had suicidal tendencies and that her overdose may have been an intentional act to take her own life.

Prosecutors said state guidelines call for Peske to receive at least 6 1/2 years in prison for the two most serious charges against him.

“The picture painted by the delivery of drugs to Ms. Henderson by the defendant was not one in which a doctor was caring for his patient, but in fact the opposite,” wrote deputy attorney generals Jeffrey Baxter and Summer Carroll. “He was not caring for her, nor was he practicing medicine.

“He was allowing her addiction to take root and strengthen, and finally he, by his actions, allowed it to take her life.

“Each red flag, each warning sign throughout the years, was a cry for help. Each and every one was ignored by the defendant.”

Peske is free on recognizance bond and no longer practices medicine, according to his lawyers.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.