Hempfield eyes creating one fire chief for its 12 departments | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield eyes creating one fire chief for its 12 departments

Megan Tomasic
1060313_web1_web-firetruck3

More than 30 days after Hempfield supervisors acknowledged potential issues in the fire department, changes could be coming to the command structure.

The goal is to have the township’s 12 volunteer fire departments report to one fire chief. Each station now has is own chief who reports to the Bureau of Fire during monthly meetings. Under that structure, the township has 12 reporting numbers that are used for reviews by New Jersey-based Insurance Services Offices Inc., or ISO.

Last month, ISO granted township officials a six-month extension to address issues like training, water flow, response times and emergency communications. If departments receive an unfavorable rating in those areas, property owners could see higher insurance premiums.

Changing the command structure is the first step toward addressing the issues.

“If we had one reporting number and everything was one, and Carbon showed up with one guy, Midway showed up with one guy, (Hempfield) No. 2 showed up with one guy and Grapeville showed up with one guy, that would look like we showed up with four people,” said Township Manager Jason Winters. “Right now, they only look like they showed up with one person each because they all have to report the incident separately.”

The proposed structure would divide the stations among three zones:

  • Zone A would include Bovard, Luxor, Hannastown and North Hempfield;
  • Zone B would be Carbon, Midway-St.Clair, Hempfield No. 2 and West Point;
  • Zone C would be Adamsburg, Fort Allen, High Park and Grapeville.

Those stations would have individual chiefs to run day-to-day operations. Above them would be a deputy fire chief to handle administration and training needs. That person would report to the township fire chief.

Winters said the command structure could be reorganized within the extended time frame, adding that changes would be made in stages. Westmoreland County then would have to approve the reporting number. Winters was unable to provide a timeline for that process.

“Where we are in six months might not be where we are in three years,” he said. “I think we take step one, coming together, and then from there start looking at overall operations.”

Officials also are moving forward with a service agreement that would set forth training regulations for stations.

Specific training hours would apply for interior firefighting and basic vehicle rescue operations. Annual hazardous materials and facility training hours also are laid out, along with separate training for driver operators and officers.

A service agreement draft provided to the Tribune-Review shows future plans for a Pennsylvania State Fire Academy essentials program that will cover hazardous materials, fire ground support, exterior and interior fires and advanced firefighter training.

“The fact is that ISO is coming up on us,” said Anthony Kovacic, director of fire and EMS. “We want to make sure that, if somebody calls for a fire department, we can respond.”

On May 14, supervisors will hold an additional public meeting to discuss Hempfield’s Bureau of Fire, command structure and service agreements. Supervisors will vote on documents starting at 7 p.m. at 1132 Woodward Drive.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.