Hempfield graduate receives engineering award at University of Akron | TribLIVE.com

Hempfield graduate receives engineering award at University of Akron

Megan Tomasic
Kelly O’Neill, a Hempfield Area High School graduate, was one of the receipents of the Trajectory Award, which gives students $10,000 to help with bills after graduation.

A former Hempfield student was one of 10 students to receive an award from the University of Akron, where she expects to graduate this year with a degree in electrical engineering.

Kelly O’Neill, a Hempfield Area High School graduate, received the Trajectory Award, which gives students $10,000 to help with bills after graduation. The award is given to senior engineering students who have high grades, work experience and have contributed to the well-being of others.

O’Neill is president of the university’s NASA Robotic Mining Competition Design Team, a group that designs and builds a mining robot that can “traverse a simulated Martian chaotic terrain” and dig into rocky material, according to a news release.

O’Neill is a member of the College of Engineering Dean’s Team, serving as a school ambassador by providing tours and attending outreach events at local high schools where she gives presentations to students and parents.

She has held internships at Kent Displays Inc., where she designed circuit layouts and made liquid crystal displays, and at Delta Displays, where she built prototypes for digital displays.

After graduation, O’Neill plans to work at Rockwell Automation in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, as a hardware test engineer.

The Trajectory Awards are granted to 10 students each year as a result of a financial gift made by Bill and Karen Feth, Akron-area philanthropists.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.