Hempfield man sued by Three Rivers Dental for social media posts | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield man sued by Three Rivers Dental for social media posts

Rich Cholodofsky
1259263_web1_WEB-scales-of-justice2

A Greensburg dentistry group claims it has been disparaged on social media by a former patient and wants a Westmoreland County judge to order the posts be removed from the web sites.

Three Rivers Dental Group on Thursday filed a libel lawsuit against Hempfield resident Robert Ottaviani, claiming he made a series of untruthful statements about the business and dental care he received this year.

According the lawsuit, Ottaviani’s initial post on Facebook on May 20 contained inaccurate information that suggested the company was under investigation for unethical and fraudulent acts. Subsequent edits to the original post and additional statements on Facebook and on other online forums continued to contain false and disparaging information, the lawsuit contends.

The alleged libelous posts continued through June 4 on other local media sites and a review on Yelp, according to the lawsuit.

Ottaviani could not be reached for comment.

A post on Yelp attributed to Ottaviani states that his insurance company was looking into claims he made.

The Tribune-Review is not restating the contents of the posts in question.

“(Three Rivers Dental) is suffering untold harm because of this malicious campaign of disparagement in that it is unable to know how many former or potential future patients have decided to go elsewhere for their dental care needs as a result of defendant’s disparaging posts online,” according to the lawsuit.

Pittsburgh attorney Marcus Schneider filed the lawsuit on behalf of the Three Rivers Dental. The lawsuit does not indicate whether complaints were lodged with Facebook or other online entities or if requests to remove the comments were made.

Schneider did not return a call seeking comment.

Saint Vincent College law professor Bruce Antkowiak said online posts and reviews are subject to libel laws but lawsuits about such comments are rare.

“Libel is a difficult and sometimes lengthy thing to prove,” Antkowiak said. “You don’t see many lawsuits because with social media sites, there’s more ability to just take down comments from sites.”

Three Rivers Dentistry is seeking unspecified monetary damages and wants a judge to ordering Ottaviani to remove the offending statements from the online sites and prohibit him from posting additional defamatory statements as the case is litigated.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.