ShareThis Page
Hempfield man will attempt to reclaim Recorder of Deeds post |

Hempfield man will attempt to reclaim Recorder of Deeds post

Rich Cholodofsky
Frank Schiefer

Republican Frank Schiefer will attempt to reclaim the Westmoreland County Recorder of Deeds post, a job he lost in 2015.

Schiefer, 38, of Hempfield served as Recorder of Deeds from 2012 through 2015, when he was defeated by the man he originally beat four years earlier to win the office. Schiefer ousted three-term Democratic incumbent Tom Murphy in the 2011 election. Murphy won back his office from Schiefer in 2015.

Murphy has said he will run for re-election this year.

“I’m excited to have the chance to implement the many customer service-friendly policies and cost-savings tools that were stopped after I left office,” Schiefer said.

The Recorder of Deeds oversees all county property records.

Schiefer touted his accomplishments during his four-year stint as head of the office, which included expansion of operating hours and enhanced online access to records.

After leaving office he worked for the Pennsylvania Turnpike Commission and last year was re-elected to serve a fourth term representing Westmoreland County on the Republican State Committee. Schiefer previously served as an elected Westmoreland County Jury Commissioner from 2009 to 2012.

He is a 1999 graduate of Hempfield Area High School and has a bachelor of arts degree in political science from West Virginia University.

He is married and has two children.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.