Hempfield school board approves purchase of property | TribLIVE.com

Hempfield school board approves purchase of property

Megan Tomasic
Dan Speicher | Tribune-Review
Hempfield Area High School

School board members voted Monday night to purchase a property adjacent to the Hempfield Area High School and administration building.

During Monday night’s public meeting, members unanimously voted to purchase the property for $45,000. Online records show the parcel, off of Route 136, is currently owned by Toya Eubank, and is connected to another district owned property.

Superintendent Tammy Wolicki said, in the short term, the purchase will allow officials to build a new road leading into the high school to help with traffic congestion and to give an additional access point in case of an emergency. Right now, the high school currently has two access points — off Route 136 and along Spartan Lane.

Officials also hope to use the space to widen a road that curves down past the high school and lets out near the administration building.

In the future, Wolicki said the property could provide additional parking.

“We do have an aging building so, at some point, we’re going to have to give some attention to the high school,” she said. “At that point we could move student parking to that area.”

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.