Hempfield school officials move forward with tax assessment appeals | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield school officials move forward with tax assessment appeals

Megan Tomasic
1444428_web1_gtr-Project1878-010319
Tribune-Review file photo
Hempfield Area School District members voted to move forward with tax assessment appeals in 2020.

The Hempfield Area School Board is moving forward with a tax assessment appeals process that spurred public outcry last year and was the driving force during the May primary election. They are retaining a Forest Hills law firm that sparked several questions from board members in the process.

Pushing up against an Aug. 1 deadline for when appeals can be filed, the board voted 6-3 this week to retain Andrews and Price. Board members Scott Learn, Paul Ward and newly appointed member Mike Alfery voted against the decision.

Right now, officials are performing tax assessment appeals on properties that have sold for $250,000 over their assessed value. Several members, however, expressed concerns about the lack of communication between the board and the law firm, as well as a lack of research into the process itself.

“I think in the fall when we talked about it, one of the opinions was to table this so we can do that research and we went ahead with the vote and approved it,” Ward said at Monday’s meeting. “And I think we haven’t done enough research to truly understand the implications of what we’re doing and how that may be impacting home purchases and development in the township.”

Ward cited a meeting with the law firm last year, suggesting questions about the process were dodged. Board member Paul Adams agreed, but added some questions asked to law firm officials were decisions only the board could make.

To make sure the firm is doing everything the board asks, Learn suggested setting up a system of checks and balances to ensure every property transfer is being checked.

Board member Diane Ciabattoni expressed the importance of reaching the deadline for the benefit of the district and taxpayers.

“I understand what you’re all saying and I do agree with some of it, but at this time for us to do any research it’s too late — any more research,” Ciabattoni said. “I do think we need to discuss this again, but I, at this late date, I’d rather have this go through and then work on it from here.”

According to board President Sonya Brajdic, if some members of the community had gone through the tax assessment appeals process in the past, the district might not have had to raise taxes for residents across the board.

When the policy was implemented, lawyers from Andrews and Price looked for properties recently sold for $100,000 or more than their assessed value, then issued appeals.

At first the district only went after commercial properties, but a 2017 Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision ruled such practices are unfair, and said taxing bodies must treat commercial and residential properties the same when evaluating assessment appeals.

Officials raised the differential to $250,000 last year after more than 70 people showed up to express their concerns that residents were being singled out.

Four commercial and seven residential tax appeals were filed in 2017, based on the $100,000 differential, Superintendent Tammy Wolicki said. The next year, 14 commercial and two residential tax appeals were filed for the 2019 tax year.

School board members will meet with lawyers from Andrews and Price during an August executive session for legal advise regarding the procedures. If any changes are made in regards to the process, they will be deliberated in public and the impact would be on tax assessment appeals filed for the 2020 tax year, Wolicki said.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.