Hempfield supervisors halt formation of public safety commission, ask for more information | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Hempfield supervisors halt formation of public safety commission, ask for more information

Megan Tomasic
802067_web1_PoliceLightsZ

Hempfield supervisors halted formation of a proposed public safety commission before an ordinance and bylaws could be drafted, asking for more information about the logistics of the operation.

The goal of the commission, which was proposed in January, is to make recommendations regarding public safety policy and service levels and present them to council. The body would include the Bureau of Fire that was formed last year and a state police representative, since Hempfield doesn’t have its own police department.

Supervisors hope to hash out the finer details in March, giving them a chance to ask questions and decide the role the commission will play.

“I think we should look for a short-term commission … for long-term benefits,” Supervisor John Silvis said, noting the Wolf administration’s proposal to charge a per capita fee for state police coverage in municipalities that don’t have their own force. “I think we’re rushing into this too fast and too soon. I don’t know if it’s because of the police issue or what, but I think we should take a step back and take our time on this.”

On Monday, Silvis and supervisors Doug Weimer and Tom Logan voted against taking steps to form the commission, overruling supervisors Chairman George Reese and Robert Ritson. Silvis and Logan asked for further details on the number of members that would sit on the board and how many township staff would be part of it.

Weimer suggested the public safety commission could upend the Bureau of Fire.

“I think that our priority was clear here a few years ago about the fire service,” Weimer said. “I think that this, in my opinion, will take away from that focus and I think jeopardize all the work that we did with bolstering our commitment to the volunteers and to our volunteer fire service. So, I have apprehensions.”

Several firefighters voiced support for the public safety commission, including Greg Saunders, chief of the Bovard Volunteer Fire Department.

Weimer suggested that, to address policing, a task force could be formed if needed, and that members of township staff are trained to discuss policing needs.

Conceptual plans for the body focused on six key areas — fire, emergency management, public safety and security, emergency medical, inspection and codes and health and wellness.

Township officials originally suggested the board would be made up of volunteers from the medical, legal, insurance, business or education fields in order to give “expert” advice on certain topics.

Monday’s vote was just the first step in the process, said township Manager Jason Winters. Supervisors will discuss the commission during the March workshop and public meeting.

“There’s more to public safety than just the fire department,” Reese said. “We have to be more forward-thinking.”

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.