Herminie man gets 2 years probation for abandoning dog | TribLIVE.com

Herminie man gets 2 years probation for abandoning dog

Renatta Signorini

A Herminie man was sentenced Wednesday to two years of probation in connection with the abandonment of a dog.

Shannon Proctor, 29, was ordered to pay $6,934 in restitution to Pet Friends in Irwin.

He pleaded guilty to cruelty and neglect of animals in connection with a dog found on a rural Sewickley Township road on Jan. 1 by a concerned citizen, according to court papers. The “terrified” animal had bedded down in thorny brush and was lured out with food, animal control officers said.

The dog was dehydrated with tremors and fleas and it had long nails and hair missing from its tail, according to court papers. It was taken for treatment and remains at Pet Friends, according to prosecutors.

Investigators posted a photo on social media of the dog in an effort to find its owner. Proctor’s wife contacted authorities and said Proctor told her that he took the dog on Dec. 29 to Pet Friends after it nipped at her face, according to court papers. Pet Friends confirmed the animal had not been taken there that day.

Proctor relinquished ownership of the dog as part of a plea agreement. He is prohibited from having pets during his probation. He paid $1,500 toward restitution.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.