Illinois man’s hacking conspiracy tied to 2016 Franklin Regional cyberattack |

Illinois man’s hacking conspiracy tied to 2016 Franklin Regional cyberattack

Patrick Varine
An Illinois man has been charged with helping to facilitate the 2016 cyberattack that affected Franklin Regional School District, the local Catholic Diocese and several other regional computer systems. Tribune-Review file
Tribune-Review file
Michaela Gabriella King is charged with unlawful use of a computer and intentionally causing a disruption of a computer system. She faces a Dec. 2, 2019, trial in the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas.

An Illinois man was sent to in prison last week for his role in providing access to illegal “booter” services, including one said to have been used in a 2016 hacking attack on the Franklin Regional School District and several other regional computer systems.

Sergiy P. Usatyuk, 20, of Orland Park, Ill., helped develop, control and operate a number of “booter” services and websites between August 2015 and November 2017, according to court documents. Those services and website were used to launch millions of “distributed denial-of-service,” or DDoS, attacks, which disrupted internet connections of targeted computers, deliberately slowed or crashed targeted websites and interrupted normal business operations, according to the U.S. Justice Department.

Booters, or stressers, are publicly-available, web-based services that allow cybercriminals to overwhelm a computer system with un-requested traffic. Prosecutors said Usatyuk created a corporation called OKServers LLC in Delaware and essentially offered a variety of hacking services for a subscription fee.

In November 2016, county prosecutors contend that Michaela G. King, then an 18-year-old senior at Franklin Regional High School, bought one of the programs and uploaded it to flood the school’s computer system with data, police said.

King was charged with two felony counts for the unlawful use of a communication device to disrupt computer functions. Her trial is scheduled to start Dec. 2 before Common Pleas Court Judge Timothy Krieger.

The “booter” attack disrupted not just Franklin Regional’s computer system but also the systems of 17 other organizations which shared the same computer infrastructure, including other school districts, the county government and its career and technology centers, and the Greensburg Catholic Diocese.

A person can launch a DDoS attack often with only a web browser and online payment along with instructions for attacking a victim computer system, justice department officials said.

“DDoS-for-hire services pose a malicious threat to the citizens of our district, as well as districts across the country, by impeding critical access to the internet and jeopardizing safety and security in the process,” said U.S. Attorney Robert J. Higdon Jr., who is located in Raleigh, N.C., where the case against Usatyuk was prosecuted. “The operation and use of these services to disrupt the operations of our businesses and other institutions cannot be tolerated. Anyone who weaponizes web traffic in this manner will be vigorously pursued and prosecuted by my office.”

The illegal services included (“ExoStresser”),,,,, and (“Betabooter”), which King is accused of using.

Usatyuk and a co-conspirator gained in excess of $550,000 from charging subscriber fees to paying customers of their booter services and selling advertising space to other booter operators, according to the justice department.

Over the past five years, booter and stresser services have grown as an increasingly prevalent class of DDoS attack tools.

“Booter-based DDoS attack tools offer a low barrier to entry for users looking to engage in cybercrime,” justice department officials said in a news release.

Patrick Varine is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Patrick at 724-850-2862, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.