ShareThis Page
Jeannette man accused of abandoning children is held for court on drug charges | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Jeannette man accused of abandoning children is held for court on drug charges

Jeff Himler
833160_web1_gtr-endangerment4-020219
Submitted
Ryan Mason, left, and Destany Stamps

Drug charges against a Jeannette man accused of abandoning his three children for more than a week in a bug-infested Greensburg home were held for court this week.

Ryan Jay Mason, 39, pleaded not guilty to charges of possession of a controlled substance, possession of drug paraphernalia and possession with intent to deliver methamphetamine brought by Latrobe police, stemming from his Jan. 25 arrest at a Latrobe residence for previous drug charges.

Mason and Destany Stamps, 36, of Jeannette, are charged with endangering the welfare of children after they allegedly abandoned their three children — a teenage boy and 5-year-old twins — for more than a week in Greensburg to avoid being arrested on outstanding warrants.

Stamps, who was wanted for violating terms of probation in a 2018 theft case, also was apprehended at the Latrobe residence on Spring Street. The couple, who were placed in the Westmoreland County Prison, waived preliminary hearings on the endangerment charges, brought by the Westmoreland County Sheriff’s Department.

Defense attorney Michael DeMatt argued police failed to establish a sufficient case for the drug delivery charge at Mason’s preliminary hearing Monday before District Judge Michael Mahady in Unity. DeMatt noted arresting Latrobe Officer Robert Derk testified the 3-4 grams of methamphetamine investigators confiscated while serving Mason with an arrest warrant in Latrobe is an amount that might be either for personal use or for sale to someone else.

“The quantity that was there really could go either way,” DeMatt said of the drug. “There’s nothing to indicate this is … intent to deliver.”

The tenant of the Latrobe home where Mason was arrested told investigators Mason sells her methamphetamine, according to court documents. But DeMatt said there was no indication such a sale had occurred on the day of the arrest.

Mahady noted Derk had pointed to other evidence that was “indicative of intent to deliver,” including $967 in cash Mason had in his possession and multiple cell phones that were “right in front of him” as he sat on a couch in the Latrobe home. Derk acknowledged Mason hadn’t admitted to owning any of the phones.

Some of the drugs confiscated from Mason were in a plastic bag he attempted to shove between the couch cushions when authorities arrived to serve the arrest warrant, Derk testified.

He said a search of Mason’s car turned up an additional bag containing methamphetamine along with a butane torch and two glass pipes with residue of the drug.

Sheriff’s Sgt. Irvin Shipley said in court documents Mason and Stamp’s children were covered “in filth and their hair was completely matted, and they were also complaining of being itchy” when they were discovered Jan. 24 hiding in a bedroom of a home on Greensburg’s Cleveland Street.

The house was filled with “the smell of rotting food and garbage,” and the children couldn’t recall when they’d last bathed, according to Shipley.

The children were placed in the custody of the county children’s bureau.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.