ShareThis Page
Police: Jeannette man involved in chase faces 10 new charges | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Police: Jeannette man involved in chase faces 10 new charges

Paul Peirce
766417_web1_gtr-claridge

A 37-year-old man who Greensburg police say led multiple Westmoreland County police departments on a chase between Jeannette and Penn Township, eventually crashing into a utility pole, has been charged with 10 more criminal and traffic complaints.

Thomas Campbell, of Jeannette, is being held in the county jail on $75,000 bond following his arrest last week for fleeing and eluding and animal cruelty. Penn Township police since filed multiple counts related to the incident, including a felony charge of illegally entering an unoccupied structure.

Campbell fled in his sport utility vehicle 1:45 p.m. Wednesday when an investigator attempted to question him about a series of recent thefts at a Gander Outdoors store, reported Detective John Swank of the Greensburg Police Department.

In addition to illegally entering a structure, Penn Township police also charged Campbell with multiple counts of reckless endangerment, criminal mischief, damaging an unoccupied structure and multiple traffic complaints in connection with the pursuit. Police apprehended Campbell hiding beneath a mobile home in Claridge several hundred yards from the location where he crashed his Jeep.

During the incident, police said Campbell abandoned a backpack with five kittens on Evans Avenue in Jeannette. Police took the kittens to Wayward Animal Rescue in Greensburg for adoption.

Campbell also was wanted on an arrest warrant by North Huntingdon police for a separate retail incident in September, according to police.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.