Judge clears Scottdale woman accused of endangering Vietnam vet | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Judge clears Scottdale woman accused of endangering Vietnam vet

Renatta Signorini
1511858_web1_web-gavelZ

A reckless endangerment charge was dismissed Wednesday against the owner of a Scottdale personal care home who had been accused of letting a Vietnam veteran walk from her facility to the New Stanton area.

District Judge Charles Moore ruled that Leah C. Ilgenfritz, 80, shouldn’t be held criminally responsible because she had been in contact with social service agencies about the resident, who was in his 60s. Ilgenfritz booked a motel room for the man and dropped off his belongings and medication, but he refused to let her drive him there and instead left on foot, according to testimony.

“She got all his belongings to the place that she had paid for,” Moore said.

Ilgenfritz said she was relieved following more than 70 minutes of contentious testimony at her preliminary hearing.

The situation that was reported on July 6, 2018, to the Westmoreland County Elder Abuse Task Force after the man was seen wandering around the New Stanton area, county Detective Ray Dupilka testified. Police said the victim has schizophrenia and a diabetic condition.

A doctor who evaluated him during an involuntary mental health commitment that day told investigators that the man was “at risk of serious bodily injury or death” if left untreated, Dupilka testified.

Four days earlier, Ilgenfritz had packaged his medications and belongings and dropped them off about 9 miles away at the Budget Inn in New Stanton. The man didn’t make it to the motel, police said.

“She didn’t know if he ever made it to the motel or if he received his requisite medication,” Dupilka testified.

Defense attorney Dennis Rafferty asked for the dismissal, arguing that Ilgenfritz never placed the man in danger. She shouldn’t be held responsible for something that happened four days later, Rafferty said.

“There’s no reason for her to do anything more,” he said. “She has no obligation to do anything more. She certainly didn’t do anything on this occasion that amounts to the crime of recklessly endangering another person.”

Assistant District Attorney Kelly Hammers argued that Ilgenfritz did not verify that the man got his belongings and medication, putting him at risk.

“She did not take any steps … to make sure he got to this location,” she said.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.