Judge gives Pershing Square hi-rise owner time to make elevator repairs | TribLIVE.com

Judge gives Pershing Square hi-rise owner time to make elevator repairs

Stephen Huba
Stephen Huba | Tribune-Review
The entrance to Pershing Square Apartments, 209 W. Third St., Greensburg, where an elevator failure led to a code violation charge in October 2018.

A judge on Wednesday gave the owner of Pershing Square Apartments in downtown Greensburg until July to repair or replace two unreliable elevators that have left several elderly residents trapped.

“Why is this taking so long?” District Magistrate Chris Flanigan asked Greensburg attorney Matt Schimizzi at a brief hearing.

“It’s a fairly substantial upgrade,” Schimizzi said, noting that the project cost is estimated at $280,000.

Schimizzi is representing the property owner, a California-based LLC known as I Choose Not To Run.

The absentee owner, which bought the West Third Street building two years ago, came under fire in October when city officials filed a criminal complaint alleging a violation of the International Property Maintenance Code.

The complaint came on the heels of two code violations the city filed in September — one pertaining to the elevators and another regarding a fire safety and evacuation plan — when an elderly resident got stuck in an elevator and had to be rescued by the fire department. The violations noted that one of the elevators was out of order, causing the remaining elevator to overheat and break down from overuse.

“Both elevators must be operational for your high-rise,” the September order said. “The city has been to your building three times in the past three weeks to (extricate) residents from the overheated elevator.”

Both elevators were back in working order by Oct. 24.

Schimizzi said his client has since hired an elevator sales and service company to do the work. One elevator should be done by April, and the other should be done by June, he said.

“They want to make sure the residents are safe, and they’re going to do whatever they can to make sure that happens,” he said.

Schimizzi and Barbara Ciampini, the city’s planning director, had worked out the details of the agreement prior to Wednesday’s hearing.

“The city is satisfied, as long as the work gets done,” she said.

Ciampini said the elevators are original to the building and are difficult to find parts for. The case will stay on the magistrate court docket until the work gets done, she said.

Pershing Square Apartments, managed by Preservation Management Inc. of South Portland, Maine, has an estimated 120 residents living on its 12 floors. Rents are subsidized by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.

I Choose Not To Run, based in Beverly Hills, Calif., is listed as a real estate investment business by the California Secretary of State. It bought the building from Pershing Square Associates for $6.7 million in February 2017, according to county records.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter @shuba_trib.

Stephen Huba is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Stephen at 724-850-1280, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.