ShareThis Page
Judge: No basis to dismiss charges against Sheriff Jonathan Held | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Judge: No basis to dismiss charges against Sheriff Jonathan Held

Rich Cholodofsky
1026306_web1_SheriffHeld2

The presiding judge in the criminal case against Westmoreland County Sheriff Jonathan Held in court documents filed Monday said he found no basis to dismiss public corruption charges in the aftermath of a December mistrial.

Senior Common Pleas Judge Timothy Creany in an 11-page opinion said prosecutors presented enough evidence to support having a jury consider conflict of interest and theft charges involving allegations that the two-term sheriff directed on-duty deputies and office staff to perform campaign chores for his re-election effort in 2015.

Held, 45, of Hempfield has denied the charges and is appealing the judge’s ruling late last year rejecting a defense bid to have the case dismissed. Held, through defense attorney Ryan Tutera, argued evidence presented during the three-day trial was not sufficient to support a potential conviction.

A series of current and former sheriff’s department employees testified during the trial that Held directed them to secure items for campaign fundraisers, used office phones to solicit donations and used county computers to track information related to the re-election effort.

Creany said testimony provided a basis for jurors to potentially find Held guilty.

The judge also defended his decision to allow the prosecution to potentially retry Held.

Creany declared a mistrial when jurors said they were unable to reach a unanimous verdict. Jurors originally brought in a guilty verdict, but during individual questioning in the courtroom, Juror No. 6 said he had changed his mind. The judge sent the jury back to continue deliberations. An hour later, he declared the mistrial.

The defense, in its appeal before the state’s Superior Court, said Creany erred when he declined to individually poll all of the jurors about their verdict and as a result he should have dismissed the case.

“… even if this decision was in error the defendant can show no prejudice, as a mistrial was later declared regardless of the outcome of the polling,” Creany wrote.

Held, a Republican, is seeking re-election this year to a third-term.

His second trial was originally scheduled to have been this month but was postponed while his appeal is litigated.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, rcholodofsky@tribweb.com or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.