Judge rules Turtle Creek man will have separate trials for Westmoreland drug deaths | TribLIVE.com

Judge rules Turtle Creek man will have separate trials for Westmoreland drug deaths

Rich Cholodofsky

An Allegheny County man charged with supplying drugs used in two fatal overdoses in Westmoreland County will have separate trials, a judge ruled Friday.

Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger, in a five-page opinion, said that it would be prejudicial for one jury to hear two separate cases against Demetrius Christmas, 30, of Turtle Creek.

He is charged with multiple counts of drug delivery resulting in death. Police claim Christmas sold fentanyl-laced heroin to another man who, in turn, sold the drugs used in the fatal overdose of a Murrysville man and then, seven weeks later, distributed drugs that authorities contend caused the death of a man in Greensburg.

Prosecutors said Paul Lucas, 31, of Murrysville, died of an overdose on April 13, 2017, and Jeffrey Gettemy, 30, of Greensburg, died June 1, 2017, from drugs that originated with Christmas.

In both cases, police said Christmas sold the drugs to Jeremy S. Mason, 34, of Manor, who, in turn, distributed them to Lucas and Gettemy.

“The court believes that, if the two cases are tried together, the unique circumstances contributing to each victim’s death would inevitably be mixed together in the jury’s mind,” Krieger wrote.

Christmas, who is in the county jail on $75,000 bond, is scheduled for trial in October.

Mason is in jail on $500,000 bond. He is charged with drug delivery resulting in death in connection with the Lucas and Gettemy overdoses. His trials have not been scheduled.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.