Judge tosses drug charges against Latrobe man | TribLIVE.com

Judge tosses drug charges against Latrobe man

Rich Cholodofsky

A Westmoreland County judge ruled Wednesday there is not enough evidence to prosecute a Latrobe man jailed since last summer on drug possession charges.

Common Pleas Court Judge Tim Krieger said a drug-filled backpack found unattended on a Latrobe street could not be adequately linked to Christopher Twigger, who had been arrested and charged after a later search of his home found additional evidence.

According to court records, a local resident spotted the backpack around 9 a.m. July 20 and called police more than five hours later after no one had claimed the bag. Police said Twigger’s photo identification along with two prescription bottles with his name as well as heroin and marijuana were discovered in the backpack. Investigators later tracked down Twigger at his home, where they alleged drug paraphernalia was discovered and led to additional charges being filed.

“The backpack was never seen in the defendant’s possession, nor was any evidence presented to show that the defendant had recently been in the area where the backpack was found and remained unattended for more than five hours,” Krieger wrote in his four-page opinion.

As a result, evidence found in the search of Twigger’s home was also invalidated, the judge ruled.

All the charges, one felony and four misdemeanor drug offenses, were dismissed against Twigger.

Twigger, 34, had been in jail since his arrest last summer in lieu of a $50,000 bond set in February. He was scheduled to appear before Krieger on April 30 for a hearing on a defense request to have him released to an inpatient drug treatment program.

It was unclear Wednesday if that hearing would still be conducted.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.