ShareThis Page
Jury finds Latrobe man guilty of second-degree murder in 2016 fatal robbery |

Jury finds Latrobe man guilty of second-degree murder in 2016 fatal robbery

Rich Cholodofsky
| Thursday, January 10, 2019 5:03 p.m
Zachery T. McGrath of Latrobe is charged in the shooting death of Daniel McNerny.

It took a Westmoreland County jury just one hour Thursday afternoon to convict a Latrobe man of second-degree murder in the fatal shooting of his friend.

The jury of eight men and four women found Zachary McGrath guilty in the Jan. 20, 2016, shooting death of Daniel McNerny in front of a home on St. Clair Street. McGrath, 23, also was convicted of robbery, conspiracy and a firearms offense.

He faces a mandatory sentence of life in prison without the possibility of parole. Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio said she will sentence McGrath in about three months.

McGrath’s defense attorney argued earlier Thursday for an acquittal, saying the killing was the result of an accident.

“He never had any intention of killing Mr. McNerny. Why would he? They were friends,” Public Defender Wayne McGrew said in his closing argument.

More than a dozen witnesses testified during the three-day trial that McGrath wore a mask and fired two shots at McNerny as he attempted to intervene in a robbery against two Pittsburgh-area drug dealers.

McNerny was not the target of the robbery or part of a group of three men that prosecutors said planned the heist.

Police said McGrath and two others stole more than $12,000 from a Pittsburgh man who traveled to Latrobe to collect a debt and sell them drugs.

McNerny came outside to help when he learned that a masked man was holding two men at gunpoint, according to the prosecution.

Witnesses said he identified McGrath by his voice and attempted to disarm him during a physical confrontation.

McGrew argued McGrath’s gun accidentally discharged as he and McNerny wrestled for the weapon during the robbery.

“They got into a fight and were fighting over the gun when it went off. How do we know whose finger was on the trigger?” McGrew asked jurors.

McGrath did not testify. The defense presented one witness, a St. Clair Street resident who claimed she heard two rapid fire shots just before the killing.

The prosecution contended a masked McGrath meant to kill McNerny after having been identified by him as the robber.

District Attorney John Peck asked jurors to find McGrath guilty of first-degree murder, which is a killing committed during the course of another felony, robbery and conspiracy.

“I’m arguing this is a first-degree murder,” Peck said. “The defendant needed to maintain the mask on his face, the secrecy who he was. That’s why he shot Daniel McNerny.”

Two other men were charged for their alleged roles in plotting the fatal robbery.

Austin Krinock, 20, of Johnstown was convicted by a Westmoreland County jury last year of second-degree murder, robbery and conspiracy. He is serving 34 years to life in prison.

Colin Gearhart, 20, of Latrobe is charged with the same offenses. His trial is scheduled to begin in March.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer.
You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.