Jury selection concludes in Scottdale man’s assault trial in connection with May 2016 accident | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Jury selection concludes in Scottdale man’s assault trial in connection with May 2016 accident

Rich Cholodofsky
1415271_web1_JuryCourtroom

Jury selection ended Monday for the trial of a Scottdale man accused of injuring a young family of four three years ago in a Mother’s Day car wreck near Youngwood.

Matthew Murphy, 27, is charged with 13 counts, including three felony offenses of aggravated assault by vehicle, in connection with the May 8, 2016, crash along Route 119 in Hempfield. Police said Murphy’s pickup slammed into the back of Vicky and William Schuler’s vehicle as they drove to church with their two young children, Gavin, 2 and Austin, 1.

Police said that, just before the crash, Murphy’s truck was traveling between 71 and 78 mph on the section of road that carries a 35-mph speed limit. The Schuler car was propelled into a concrete barrier, rolled over multiple times and came to rest on a grass lot on East Third Street, according to court records.

Witnesses said Murphy’s truck continued into the parking lot of a nearby shopping plaza and side-swiped a parked vehicle before it came to rest.

All four members of the Schuler family were seriously injured.

Testimony in the case before Westmoreland County Common Pleas Judge Tim Krieger will begin Tuesday morning after lawyers make opening statements.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.