Photo circulates of KKK flag displayed in Sewickley Township public works building | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Photo circulates of KKK flag displayed in Sewickley Township public works building

Joe Napsha
1193013_web1_gtr-SewickleyKKK2-052419
This photograph of a Ku Klux Klan flag hanging in Sewickley Township public works garage recently surfaced before the May 18, 2019, primary election. Supervisor and public works director Joe Kerber said he ordered the flag be removed when he saw it displayed in 2016 or 2017.

A Sewickley Township supervisor is blaming a political enemy for helping share an old photograph of a Ku Klux Klan flag hanging inside the public works garage, though he downplayed the impact of the attack in his sound primary election defeat.

“It was a ploy to get (something) started,” said Supervisor Joe Kerber, who also serves as the municipality’s public works director.

The photograph was taken three years ago, Kerber said. It began circulating via email and text prior to the May 21 primary election.

Kerber said he ordered the flag removed from the building as soon as he saw it. A driver hung the flag, and it was on display for only a few minutes before it was taken out of the building, Kerber said.

No disciplinary actions were taken against the driver, Kerber said. The incident occurred before the township had created an employee policy regarding such actions, he said.

Alan Fossi, a former township supervisor, disputed Kerber’s time frame for when the flag was displayed. He said the incident occurred in mid-2017, while he was in office — though he said he was not aware of it at the time. Fossi lost his bid for re-election in November 2017.

“It was disgusting,” Fossi said.

Fossi, who clashed with Kerber when he served on the board, asked Kerber at a public meeting before the election if he had known about the KKK flag.

Kerber blames Fossi for disseminated the photo. Fossi denied the claim.

Far more people have seen the flag through the circulated photo than the seven people who were in the building at the time it was displayed, Kerber said.

Supervisor Brian Merdian, who was elected in 2017, said he was not aware a KKK flag had been displayed in the public works building.

“I’m totally dumbfounded. I have never seen anything like that” on township property, Merdian said.

Kerber, a Democrat, lost his bid in his party’s primary for another six-year term. Linda Harvey, the township’s tax collector, received 61.2% of votes, compared to Kerber’s 37.8%, according to unofficial results.

The KKK flag photo had no connection to his primary defeat, Kerber said.

Township Auditor Sondra Dull, one of Kerber’s critics, said she was aware of the KKK flag photo about 18 months ago. Dull, who won the Republican nomination to the Yough School Board in the primary, said she did not believe it played a role in Kerber’s defeat.

The Pennsylvania Human Relations Commission could initiate an investigation into racial discrimination on its own or if a complaint is filed, said Renee Martin, an agency spokeswoman.

“If we see a problem, we will file (a complaint),” Martin said. “We have several different ways to proceed.”

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.