Kyle Baxter announces bid to become Westmoreland County judge |

Kyle Baxter announces bid to become Westmoreland County judge

Rich Cholodofsky
North Huntingdon lawyer Kyle Baxter is a candidate for Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas judge.

North Huntingdon lawyer Kyle Baxter said Friday she will be a candidate for judge this spring to fill one of two vacancies on the Westmoreland County Court of Common Pleas.

Baxter, 51, is a Republican but plans to cross-file to run in both the GOP and Democratic primaries in May.

Baxter practices at her own Greensburg-based law firm handling family court and criminal cases. She previously served as a part-time assistant public defender and as a mediator and parenting coordinator. She previously worked for nearly a decade as a prosecutor in the Westmoreland County District Attorney’s Office.

“My goal is to continue to use my experience to help families that find themselves at the steps of our courthouse to find amicable and fair resolutions to the vast variety of issues that confront them. It would be an honor to bring my extensive experience and qualifications as a litigator, guardian for children and mediation specialist to the bench and provide our families with fair and well-reasoned resolutions,” Baxter said.

She is one of five candidates who have announced campaigns seeking to fill the vacancies on the 11-judge bench. Judge Richard E. McCormick Jr. retired in 2018 and Judge Anthony Marsili left retired at the start of this year.

Baxter is married and has two children.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.