Latrobe man accused of animal cruelty after 17 pets found dead | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Latrobe man accused of animal cruelty after 17 pets found dead

Renatta Signorini
1680490_web1_RatThing

A Latrobe man posted $500 bond last week after he was arrested on animal cruelty charges in connection with 17 dead animals found inside his former Derry Township mobile home.

Andrew T. Pevarnik, 44, had been evicted from the home in April. The animals — 11 guinea pigs, five rats and a mouse — weren’t found until June 20.

Humane police officers reported in court papers that the home smelled strongly of mildew, urine and feces on June 21 after being given permission to go inside. They found the dead animals in cages and aquariums without food or water, according to court papers.

The animals were taken for necropsies to determine a cause of death. Pevarnik is charged with several counts each of aggravated cruelty to animals, neglect and animal cruelty.

He was arraigned Thursday. A phone number for him could not be located. He did not have an attorney listed in online court records. A preliminary hearing is set for Sept. 25.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.