ShareThis Page
Latrobe OKs 26 percent hike in garbage fees, hears union drivers’ concerns |

Latrobe OKs 26 percent hike in garbage fees, hears union drivers’ concerns

Jeff Himler
Jeff Himler | Tribune-Review
The city of Latrobe municipal building, at Jefferson and Main streets.

Latrobe residents will see their quarterly garbage collection bills increase by $15, or an average of 26 percent, this year under a new five-year contract between the city and its refuse hauler, Republic Services.

With Mayor Rosie Wolford absent, city council Monday voted 6-0 in favor of the agreement, which is retroactive to the beginning of the year. But a city public works employee voiced concern about Republic taking over some responsibilities from union employees for transporting large roll-off garbage bins.

Republic won’t increase its charge to the city in the second year of the contract. While the city will pay an additional 2 percent to the hauler in each of the remaining three years, city manager Wayne Jones said he hopes Latrobe won’t have to pass those increases on to residential customers.

This year’s quarterly residential rates are $66 for those who place their trash in bags and $81 for those who use wheeled “toter” containers. “During the last contract, we had a rate increase in the middle of the five-year term, and I’d like to avoid that,” Jones said.

Councilman James Kelley pointed out the cost to the city increased a total of 31 percent over the course of the past garbage contract, compared with the 32 percent cumulative hike slated in the new agreement. “That’s a difference of only 1 percent between the two contracts,” he said.

Latrobe residents will continue to pay an additional per-bag sticker fee of 40 cents for garbage collection.

The monthly bag rate for commercial customers is expected to increase from $18.50 to $23.50 this year, but Jones noted commercial rates have yet to be finalized.

Jones said he’d talked with representatives of American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees Local 629 about a shift in work duties for some of the bargaining unit’s eight public works employees under the new contract.

He explained the city’s union drivers no longer will haul large roll-off bins containing construction debris from city customers directly to a local landfill for disposal. Instead, they will haul the bins to the city transfer station, where the debris will be compacted before Republic transports it to the landfill.

Todd Dalton, secretary-treasurer of the union local and one of the affected drivers, suggested the change will cost the city money.

“We feel the city is making more money by us doing it rather than contracting it out,” Dalton said. “Some of the figures that were thrown at us just don’t match up.”

He said the city has charged customers $190 to dispose of a 30-cubic-yard roll-off bin, but now it will pay Republic $200 per load to complete transport of that waste to the landfill.

Latrobe still will be ahead financially when considering the wear and tear saved on its trucks and the employees that will be freed up for other work, including serving new commercial customers the city hopes to attract, Jones said.

“We have some vehicles that are from 2005 or older,” he said. “We need to baby them, and this will help reduce the overall wear and tear.”

Jones said he plans to meet with union representatives next week to address the members’ concerns.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter @jhimler_news.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.