Police: 2 arrested on drug charges when heroin found during search | TribLIVE.com

Police: 2 arrested on drug charges when heroin found during search

Paul Peirce

Latrobe police arrested two city residents over the weekend on multiple heroin-possession charges after confiscating nearly three bundles of heroin and suspected drug paraphernalia inside an apartment, according to court records.

Marcus J. Grasmick, 26, and Kathy L. Runyon, 45, are charged with possession and delivery of a controlled substance, possession of heroin and possession of drug paraphernalia. Grasmick also is charged with illegal possession of a firearm by a felon after officers recovered a .22-caliber handgun in the apartment.

According to Officer Matthew Reeves, when officers arrived about 8 p.m. to serve a search warrant at the couple’s apartment on the 500 block of Main Street, a man was knocking on the front door but ran away. He was subsequently detained and released.

Reeves said police forced their way into the apartment and located Grasmick and Runyon in a back bedroom.

Police seized 42 stamp bags of suspected heroin, multiple empty stamp bags, syringes, a digital scale and $350, Reeves reported. Police also said they confiscated three cellphones.

Grasmick and Runyon were ordered held in the Westmoreland County Prison on $50,000 bail each. A preliminary hearing is scheduled March 25 before District Judge Michael Mahady.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.