Ligonier man accused in burglary jailed on $50K bond |

Ligonier man accused in burglary jailed on $50K bond

Paul Peirce

A 32-year-old man who previously served time for a burglary conviction was back in the Westmoreland County Prison Thursday, accused of breaking into a Ligonier Township home.

Joshua J. Miller, of the village of Waterford, was arraigned before District Judge Denise Thiel on charges of burglary, criminal trespass, receiving stolen property and theft filed by Ligonier Police. Thiel ordered Miller held in the prison after he failed to post $50,000 bail.

Officer James Friscarella said he was called to a burglary about 6:30 p.m. Wednesday on Pole Bridge Lane, where he was provided a surveillance video of the suspect. Friscarella said he recognized Miller.

“The video clearly shows a male walking around, with gloves and a large coat rummaging through the residence. I immediately recognized the male in the video as Joshua Miller … this officer has spoken with him on several occasions,” Friscarella said in court documents.

When Friscarella questioned Miller, police said he claimed to have taken only a box of cold medicine and a bracelet from the home.

In November 2017, Miller pleaded guilty before Judge Christopher Feliciani to a 2016 burglary and was sentenced to serve up to two years in county prison and two years parole afterward unless he completed an in-patient drug and alcohol treatment program. Online court records indicate Miller was paroled into an area drug and alcohol center in 2018.

Miller’s preliminary hearing on the new complaints is scheduled April 3.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.