ShareThis Page
Ligonier Township supervisor accused of stealing gun from ex-wife | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Ligonier Township supervisor accused of stealing gun from ex-wife

Renatta Signorini
808986_web1_gtr-Ligonzone2-032715
Tribune-Review
Wade Thomas, left, whispers to solicitor Michael Korns in this Tribune-Review file photo from a 2015 Ligonier Township supervisors and planning commission public hearing.

A Ligonier Township supervisor was arrested Wednesday for allegedly stealing a handgun from his ex-wife, according to court papers.

Wade Edward Thomas, 57, is free on $100,000 unsecured bond on theft and receiving stolen property charges.

Westmoreland County detectives said the gun was reported stolen Jan. 13 from the victim’s truck while it was parked in Ligonier Borough. Thomas admitted to investigators that he took it earlier that month but later returned the firearm. The gun was found at the back door of the victim’s home on Jan. 25, police said.

A divorce was granted Monday.

Attorney Tim Kinney said they are still gathering information about the allegations and declined to comment after a brief arraignment hearing. Wade was ordered to have no contact with the victim. A March 13 preliminary hearing is set.

Thomas is supervisor board chairman. His term expires in December.

Renatta Signorini is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Renatta at 724-837-5374, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.