Groups to host Greensburg vigil against refugee detention camps |

Groups to host Greensburg vigil against refugee detention camps

Megan Tomasic

Voice of Westmoreland, a nonpartisan community group that works to give everyone a voice, is hosting a candlelight vigil Friday, “to end human detention camps” on the U.S.’s southern border.

Members of the group will join the community to “protest the inhumane conditions faced by refugees in our own country,” a news release reads.

The event is part of a worldwide protest hosted by Lights for Liberty, a coalition of grassroots activists. The event will take place in towns across the nation, according to the Lights for Liberty website, including areas of Canada, Germany, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Japan and Mexico.

Starting at 8:30 p.m. at the 200 block of North Main Street in Greensburg, protesters hope to bring attention to children split from their families and the treatment of children and adult refugees.

“The conditions at the migrant detention centers are appallingly cruel and inhumane,” Clare Dooley, a co-founder of VOW, said in the release. “I am outraged by how our own government is treating people who are fleeing from violence in their home countries. We demand an end to this horrible treatment of our fellow human beings.”

Several groups in Pittsburgh — Casa San Jose, All for All, 1Hood, ARYSE, Pittsburgh United and Bend the Arc — are joining in, according to a Facebook event page. The groups will urge Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf to shut down the Berks County detention center.

Megan Tomasic is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Megan at 724-850-1203, [email protected] or via Twitter .

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.