MAWC spent more than $100,000 for tests following Beaver Run Reservoir gas well breach | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

MAWC spent more than $100,000 for tests following Beaver Run Reservoir gas well breach

Rich Cholodofsky
1313459_web1_gtr-WellFolo001-020619

The Municipal Authority of Westmoreland County spent more than $100,000 on air and water quality tests conducted in response to gas well breach in late January at Beaver Run Reservoir, officials said.

“We will forward those bills to CNX,” authority manager Michael Kukura said.

CNX Resources, which operates the 55 gas wells at the reservoir property in Bell, said a drop in pressure at one of the drilling sites caused natural gas to be discharged into the ground and beneath the water supply. The state Department of Environmental Resources this year issued a notice of violations against CNX finding the energy company failed to construct and operate a well to ensure the well integrity is maintained and that it did not equip the well with casings of sufficient strength.

CNX officials said the issue with the wells was corrected and the problematic drilling site has been capped.

Authority officials contracted with researchers at Indiana University of Pennsylvania for additional daily and weekly testing of the reservoir site to monitor any potential impacts related to the well breach. Those tests found no irregularities with the reservoir’s water quality and air emissions, deputy manager Jack Ashton said.

“We wanted to make sure there was nothing else there that we didn’t see,” Ashton said.

CNX spokesman Brian Aiello said, “We work very closely with MAWC on all matters related to our activity on the property and certainly intend to do so with regard to the costs incurred as a result of additional testing.”

He said CNX performed its own air monitoring and private water well testing in the area around company operations and found no environmental impact.

The testing done by IUP was in addition to the routine water and air monitoring it performs at the reservoir for the authority.

Authority board members on Wednesday rehired IUP, agreeing to pay the school $133,000 for quarterly water and air testing at the reservoir during the next 12 months. IUP has conducted water-quality tests at the reservoir since 2011 and on emissions at the site since 2015.

Results from the tests are made public on IUP’s website.

Those results have showed no abnormalities, Ashton said.

“To date, there has been nothing indicated, no issues,” Ashton said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.