Microburst slams Delmont, topples trees | TribLIVE.com

Microburst slams Delmont, topples trees

Joe Napsha

Lisa and Lou Garbin’s two-story garage behind their Delmont home was saved from being cut in half Wednesday night when a large tree toppled by a storm crashed through the roof and landed on the upper floor.

“We were saved by a couch,” Lou Garbin said of the tree that came to rest on a piece of soft furniture in the garage at the rear of his East White Oak Drive home.

The Garbins weren’t home around 7 p.m. Wednesday when a microburst slammed into Delmont, causing the tree to slice through the roof and stretch into their neighbor’s backyard.

“It came upon us real quick,” said Delmont Fire Chief Rich Balik, noting that other trees were toppled as well.

One of Garbin’s neighbors, Bob Watkins, said he was in the back of his house when the microburst hit, causing such heavy rain that he never heard the trees fall.

Firefighters spent several hours using chainsaws to cut the tree. They removed a section of the trunk that was lodged in the roof by wrapping a chain around the tree and hooking it to the front of a fire truck, which pulled part of the tree off the roof.

The National Weather Service determined the microburst hit between 7 and 7:15 p.m., said Matthew Kramar, a weather service meteorologist.

The weather service was not aware of any other community that suffered damage from a microburst, Kramar said.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Tree that sliced through detached two-story garage in Delmont on Wednesday, Sept. 11, 2019.
Joe Napsha | Tribune-Review
Delmont firefighter stands next to the large tree that had been cut so it could be removed from the roof of a garage on East White Oak Drive, Delmont.
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.