ShareThis Page
Mike O’Barto gets GOP nod in quest to return as Unity supervisor | TribLIVE.com
Westmoreland

Mike O’Barto gets GOP nod in quest to return as Unity supervisor

Jeff Himler
1195199_web1_gtr-O-Barto2-051519
Mike O’Barto
1195199_web1_gtr-McCommons2-051519-photo
Paul McCommons

Unity’s Republican voters Tuesday gave former township supervisor Mike O’Barto a vote of confidence for returning to the role he left less than two years ago.

O’Barto believes his 24-year history as a supervisor is a main reason why he led the field of three GOP candidates in a primary election that attracted a light turnout at the polls. He garnered 954 votes to 745 for Paul McCommons, a retired state police corporal who fell short in his second bid for supervisor, and 183 for Marcus Burrik, owner of a construction firm who indicated he would not actively campaign after learning O’Barto was in the race.

“I think people responded to my experience and my past performance as a township supervisor,” O’Barto said Wednesday.”I think the future really looks good for Unity Township because of what has been in place, not just because of me. If I am fortunate enough to be re-elected, I want to be a piece of that puzzle.”

In November, O’Barto will face Doug Murphy, who was unopposed for the Democratic nomination. Like McCommons, Murphy unsuccessfully ran in 2017 for the supervisor post O’Barto vacated when he won a seat on the Greater Latrobe School Board.

Despite the small numbers overall at Tuesday’s polls, O’Barto said, “I was able to get out my core supporters, and it worked out well for me.”

O’Barto felt good about his door-to-door campaigning. “I was knocking on as many doors as I could, trying to meet as many people as I could,” he said. “It was a fun campaign where I stayed very positive.”

According to the Pennsylvania School Code, a person can’t simultaneously serve in the two elected positions of school board member and township supervisor, but O’Barto isn’t ready to talk about that potential problem.

“I don’t want to put the cart before the horse,” he said. “I have a lot of work to do as a school board director now, and that’s what I intend to do.”

McCommons was disappointed by the low voter turnout, citing a dearth of major issues locally.

He said rainy weather hampered his plans for door-to-door campaigning and speculated that Burrik may have drawn away votes that could have been his.

“The way I look at it, I didn’t lose, the taxpayers did,” McCommons said, arguing that the supervisors should be doing more to attract businesses that could bring jobs with good wages to the township. During his campaign, he suggested Unity would be a good site for a convention center.

McCommons wasn’t sure he would run again for supervisor but said he plans to continue voicing his concerns at the township board’s meetings.

Jeff Himler is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Jeff at 724-836-6622, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.