Monessen woman gets probation after making deal in drug operation case |

Monessen woman gets probation after making deal in drug operation case

Rich Cholodofsky

A Monessen woman was sentenced Tuesday to three years probation in connection with what police said was a drug distribution ring operating out of a Greensburg doctor’s office.

Rebekah Rose Carwithen, 25, pleaded guilty to one count of drug possession and in return state prosecutors dismissed charges of conspiracy, corruption, forgery and identity theft.

According to court records, Carwithen was one of six people charged in a plot to acquire prescription opioids, specifically Suboxone, a drug used to wean heroin addicts. The drugs were illegally purchased in 2015 and 2016 at various pharmacies throughout Westmoreland and Fayette counties, authorities said. Police said the former office manager and a patient of Greensburg physician Dr.Nabil Jabbour falsified prescriptions and Carwithen and others allowed their identifies to be used to obtain the medication and also posed as other patients.

Police said Jabbour’s office manager, Sabrina Thomas, 27, of Fairbank, Fayette County, and former patient, Brook Cross, 27, of Largo, Fla., spearheaded the drug operation.

In court Tuesday, Westmoreland County Common Pleas Court Judge Meagan Bilik-DeFazio imposed the probation sentence and ordered Carwithen to complete drug and alcohol treatment.

Thomas, Cross and three others, Rhonda Anthony, 43, Jacqueline R. Keys, 33, and Adam Fincik, 24, all of West Newton, were scheduled to appear before Bilik DeFazio for a November trial but those cases have since been postponed.

Jabbour, 68, of Greensburg, is awaiting trial on federal charges of insurance fraud and for the unlawful distribution of prescription drugs. His trial in U.S. District Court in Pittsburgh is scheduled to begin Dec. 2.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.