Mt. Pleasant man accused of threatening 3 people with knife |

Mt. Pleasant man accused of threatening 3 people with knife

Paul Peirce

A 40-year-old Mt. Pleasant man is being held in the Westmoreland County Prison after allegedly threatening three people with a knife.

Daniel J. Abbruzzese was arraigned Friday on charges of aggravated assault, making terroristic threats and criminal mischief filed by borough police in connection with the incident that occurred just before midnight Thursday along the 300 block of Washington Street, according to court documents.

According to the complaint filed by officer Trevor Ely, Abbruzzese became angry when the victims allegedly taunted him about using a plastic chair to save a parking space along the street. Police allege he left his porch, chased the men with the knife and then scratched one of the victim’s car with the blade.

When police arrested Abbruzzese Friday, Ely reported he was “heavily intoxicated” and carrying three knives.

“When questioned about the incident, (Abbruzzese) kept stating, ‘I didn’t even get that close to them,’ ” Ely wrote in court documents.

Senior District Judge Eileen Conroy of Allegheny County ordered Abbruzzese held in the county prison after he failed to post $10,000 bail. A preliminary hearing is scheduled May 16.

Paul Peirce is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Paul at 724-850-2860, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.