Mt. Pleasant man jailed for allegedly hitting borough cop |

Mt. Pleasant man jailed for allegedly hitting borough cop

Joe Napsha

A Mt. Pleasant man was jailed Friday for allegedly hitting a borough police officer on the shoulder multiple times last month when the officer was arresting him, police said.

Gregory N. Freed, 26, of 114 First St., is accused of hitting Mt. Pleasant Patrolman Timothy Ferree as the officer attempted to place him under arrest at 8 p.m. July 31 near East Main Street and Kennedy Avenue, according to Freed’s arrest papers.

Officers had confronted Freed as they investigated a woman’s complaint that Freed allegedly was violating a protection from abuse order when he entered the woman’s vehicle, sent her text messages and phoned her, according to the arrest documents.

Freed was able to run away from Feree and Patrolman Rex Hunter as they attempted to subdue him, police wrote. Ferree, who said he sustained two cuts on his arm, said Freed eluded their search.

Ferree charged Freed on Aug. 1 with aggravated and simple assault, resisting arrest and violating a protection from abuse order.

Westmoreland County sheriff’s deputies found Freed on Friday.

He was arraigned before Norvelt Senior District Judge Roger Eckels. Freed was placed in the Westmoreland County Prison in lieu of a $50,000 bond, pending a preliminary hearing before Eckels on Sept. 5.

Joe Napsha is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Joe at 724-836-5252, [email protected] or via Twitter .

Categories: Local | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.