ShareThis Page
Multiple rape cases against Mt. Pleasant cop to be tried together in Westmoreland County |

Multiple rape cases against Mt. Pleasant cop to be tried together in Westmoreland County

Rich Cholodofsky

Allegations that a suspended Mt. Pleasant Borough police officer raped and sexually assaulted six different woman in four counties can be tried together in Westmoreland County, a judge ruled on Monday.

Common Pleas Court Judge Christopher Feliciani, following a brief hearing, reaffirmed a ruling he issued in 2017 that consolidated all six cases filed against John Andrew Brown, 46, of Mt. Lebanon, who prosecutors contend sexually assaulted women in Westmoreland, Allegheny, Beaver and Erie counties.

Brown initially was charged in 2016 in Westmoreland County after a woman claimed she was choked and raped at a Donegal Township apartment. A year later, similar allegations surfaced from five other women who claimed Brown assaulted them in the same manner.

The judge previously ruled that all six cases against Brown could be prosecuted in Westmoreland County and tried at the same time.

Defense attorney Valerie Veltri on Monday argued Brown should only be tried for the original case in Westmoreland County. The other cases should be dismissed because he was not charged in any other jurisdiction, Veltri said.

“It’s improper venue and we will file an appeal,” Veltri said.

Brown’s trial is scheduled to begin next month, but an appeal could delay the cases indefinitely, Veltri said.

Rich Cholodofsky is a Tribune-Review staff writer. You can contact Rich at 724-830-6293, or via Twitter .

Categories: News | Westmoreland
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.